Countries Like UK, ireland, cannda, Australia they come under common wealth countries.
Traditionally they were ruled by common denominator the Numerator kept fluctuating though over period of time. What is good for one country may not be good of other everyone has its choices, everyone tries to optimize opportunities available to trade.
( This Article is written in general sense not to hurt any sentiment if any)
What are then can be categorized Un-Common wealth countries? Those countries which never had this common wealth but generated wealth on there own over period of time.
There are are basically two category of English speaking countries for Common Man to migrate One is CommonWealth other is Un-commonwealth countries.
The Un-common wealth countries have greater focus on enterprise to create wealth over period of time. Having said that Even Common-Wealth has on later half of century focus on Enterprise. So the culture of Enterprise is building up in Common wealth. Whereas Uncommon Wealth countries did start and rose from scratch due to enterprise power.
Still you can see though the traces of Common Wealth in countries and which will ever remain. It is just how things came up in history in particular area.
Where are those traces exist? Actually you can Easily See it I do not want to focus on that right now.
Un-Common wealth: Which was not Actually common than common wealth did come up over period of time with trial-error of enterprise and economic policies. Why I say trial and error because in between there were periods of learning from great depression those were period of error which gave new rooms for innovation, careful calibration, refinement in economic policies from where new models of Keynesian economics were implemented.
We know GDP growth Rate = C+G + I + E -X
G Government Expenditure, I Investment, E Export, X import, C private consumption.
Reduction is interest rate upped The C and I while government increased its G which lead to revival and growth but before this lets Say say’s law was in use. But I am not Economist to get into details point I am making is “Every Chaos bring Innovation”.
Un-Common wealth Countries had to go through lot of Chaos which brought these economic, technological , social innovations which brougth lot of Common Wealth to Un-common wealth countries hence increasing the employment and growth Chances.
Even today many countries have to keep date with past and traditions restricting the scope of innovations and enterprise and hence in a way reducing there chances to create employment and growth which comes with enterprise.
So For Common Man it would be nice to migrate to Common Wealth or To Un-common Wealth countries. Its tricky question
But Un-Common is actually Common and Common is actually un-common.
Are you getting what I mean here?
There is saying in Hindi which goes like this ” The person Who say he prays to God a lot or too much religious actually when you go deep he/she actually not religious enough his thought pattern is like that.”
That is same concept which is going here:
Every Common Wealth is actually Un-common While Actually Un-common wealth is actually Common wealth.